Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/08/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Another Altered Photo - better version
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Mon Aug 7 12:33:17 2006
References: <4dccee3d0608070811m7825d6aaw62e9c7bf9edf5de2@mail.gmail.com> <3.0.6.32.20060807132408.00b68da0@pop.mail.yahoo.ca> <44D77B5A.4020908@waltjohnson.com> <1748946B-F9AC-4C64-BF28-EA5F70FCE3EC@mac.com> <3924F5D9-6063-49B6-A29C-7B914FF6B0A8@pandora.be> <7077D53A-D88D-4265-AB6D-5BA3504ECB5A@mac.com>
Dump it in another country as has always been done? ;-)
I might be terribly wrong, but wasn't fusion the technique without
waste (but H2O)? Just very hard to realize due to the need of extreme
pressure?
Op 7-aug-06, om 20:55 heeft Lottermoser George het volgende geschreven:
> And we will do what with the waste? ; ^ )
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george@imagist.com
>
>
>
> On Aug 7, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Philippe Orlent wrote:
>
>> nuclear fusion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies:
Reply from jsluss at hughes.net (John Sluss) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo - better version)
In reply to:
Message from dcm at pobox.com (David C. Mason) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo)
Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo - better version)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo - better version)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo - better version)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo - better version)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo - better version)