Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Another Altered Photo - better version
From: bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C)
Date: Mon Aug 7 10:24:13 2006
References: <4dccee3d0608070811m7825d6aaw62e9c7bf9edf5de2@mail.gmail.com>

There are no clone marks on this version.

http://www.photoartworld.com/newalteredphoto.jpg.

If your going to cheat, do it right!

-dan c.

At 11:38 AM 07/08/2006 -0400, you wrote:
>That's what I would have fired him for - the biggest difference between the
>two images is all the damn clone stamp marks all over the one on the left.
>:-)
>
>
>On 8/7/06 11:11 AM, "David C. Mason" <dcm@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>> Hopefully they also canned him for doing a crappy job of altering the
photo.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/7/06, Gregory Rubenstein <gcr910@msn.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Reuters has canned a photographer in Beirut for altering a photo,
according
>>> to an article at the following link from MSNBC.
>>> 
>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13165165/
>>> 
>>> This includes the photo, altered and unaltered, as well as Reuter's 
>>> story.
>>> 
>>> Greg Rubenstein
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo - better version)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo - better version)
Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo - better version)
In reply to: Message from dcm at pobox.com (David C. Mason) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo)
Message from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo)