Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]And even I agree with that. He didn't add buildings, though: just a result of his awful cloning technique. Op 7-aug-06, om 19:46 heeft Tina Manley het volgende geschreven: > At 01:38 PM 8/7/2006, you wrote: >> One thing I keep coming back to is the original issue of >> "fakeness". You say altered, I say enhanced? You say potato and I >> say American Fries? >> >> Walt > > But, Walt, he didn't just increase the contrast. He added smoke > and the, the Reuters site says, cloned buildings. I think adding > contrast and adjusting levels and color balance are fine, as long > as they don't intentionally change the meaning of the photo (for > example, darkening OJ's skin). Adding and subtracting things from > the photos are fine for fine art, portraits and advertising, but > not for photojournalism. > > Tina > > Tina Manley, ASMP > www.tinamanley.com > > Faces of Iraq: > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/faces_of_iraq > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >