Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Another Altered Photo
From: bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen)
Date: Mon Aug 7 09:20:16 2006

No, they shouldn't go back to film - but the photos should be carefully
examined before being run. And when at all possible, raw images should be
examined.


On 8/7/06 12:08 PM, "John Sluss" <jsluss@hughes.net> wrote:

> Any comment on the integrity and honesty of the photographer?  Maybe all
> news photographers should go back to film and transmit the negatives to the
> newspaper? Is it time to look at all photographs coming out of a war zone 
> as
> questionable, to be looked at with a jaundiced eye?
> 
> Just a couple of thoughts.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Walt Johnson" <walt@waltjohnson.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 11:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Another Altered Photo
> 
> 
>> I'm sure those in the unaltered photo were much happier being bombed in
>> low contrast. As I mentioned before, look at Christopher Anderson's work
>> http://www.magnumphotos.com/c/ on the Magnum site. Anderson, a Canadian,
>> should be relatively objective. His work seems to be straightforward and
>> for him, a very risky business. Wonder what rationale Limbaugh would use
>> prove Anderson's images fake? Perhaps he could call on Westmoreland's PR
>> expert who stated Nick Ut faked it with his napalm shot. I've heard tales
>> David Turnley missed the shot loading an M3 but that Ut was also using a
>> Leica?
>> 
>> Walt
>> 
>> Gregory Rubenstein wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Reuters has canned a photographer in Beirut for altering a photo,
>>> according to an article at the following link from MSNBC.
>>> 
>>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13165165/
>>> 
>>> This includes the photo, altered and unaltered, as well as Reuter's
>>> story.
>>> 
>>> Greg Rubenstein
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from jsluss at hughes.net (John Sluss) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo)