Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hoppy, Follow this link, it is also the same place that sells Sonny his Natura 1600 http://www.unicircuits.com/shop/product_info.php?cPath=22&products_id=112 Don don.dory@gmail.com On 7/29/06, G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > > Thanks, Don. The original Leica 1.25 is a horrendous price here though. > What > are the details on the Japanese option you mentioned? Dioptre correction > built in would be a big plus, as well. > Cheers > Hoppy > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Don Dory > Sent: Saturday, 29 July 2006 13:16 > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] basic older M lens question > > Hoppy, > As the proud owner of a new to you 135 lens I would suggest that you pick > up > an eyepiece magnifier. Leica makes a good one and their is one available > in > the Japanese market that offers more magnification and diopter correction > to > boot. Benefits, makes the 135 frameline more like a 50mm FOV, increases > RF > accuracy especially at the difficult to judge mid distances where you > don't > see detail in the viewfinder but dof is still critical if you are using > apertures wider than F8. Downsides would mainly be reduced eye relief and > a > decrease in viewfinder brightness. > > Proud owner of both the Canon and Nikon knockoffs of the Zeiss 135 Sonnar > as > well as a real Zeiss aus Jena 135 Sonnar. All very nice lenses and in the > Japanese versions really nice chrome on brass construction. > > Don > don.dory@gmail.com > > > On 7/28/06, G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > > > > Thanks Marc, and I'll take that as another authoritative opinion. > > I been and gone and bought it. > > I shall post some results > > > > Remind me to Babelfish or Google your tag-line, sometime. > > > > Cheers > > Hoppy > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org > > [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf > Of > > Marc James Small > > Sent: Saturday, 29 July 2006 10:37 > > To: Leica Users Group > > Subject: Re: [Leica] basic older M lens question > > > > At 01:53 PM 7/28/06 +1000, G Hopkinson wrote: > > >Folks, pardon the basic question. > > > > > >I'm looking at getting an inexpensive 135mm for occasional use on my M6 > > .85. > > > > > >I've read a little but am still unsure on some mechanics regarding > which > > >ones have the detachable mount or require the viso? system. > > > > > >Herr Putt's review of the f4 Elmar 135 has nary a word on any adaptor > > >requirement. > > > > > >The lens I have inquired about is currently in our FS from a member in > > >Singapore. > > > > > >It's listed as M mount. I have no idea as yet regarding whether it > works > > >normally on my M or requires the adaptor system. > > > > Hoppy > > > > This lens will mount directly to any M camera and will do you proud -- > > Hell, I own one and love it for its magnificent performatnce. An ADDED > > benefit with this lens, which you can ignore if you wish, is that the > > lens-head can be unscrewed and then used in turn with an adaptor to fit > > itself to VISO use. > > > > I regard a 135 as the perfect lens for a Leica M but, then, I hate > > wide-angles used thoughtlessly, as would seem to be the case. > > > > (Calm down, guys: that is just an expression of opinion that I have > given > > here since 1994 or whenver, and not an invitation for a flame war. I > know > > what Capa said, and I disagree, and so be it.) > > > > Marc > > > > msmall@aya.yale.edu > > Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir! > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >