Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bob, You are perhaps being overly sensitive to an editor not knowing what is going on. :) So what if a 1DsMkII becomes 35mm? And compared to an APS-C sized sensor chip a Hasselblad is large format. Personally, I put it down to people not wanting to keep up with the technical, it's a widget that magically makes whatever it is that you need made. With the number of native born folk that go into the sciences dropping every year what do you expect? Don don.dory@gmail.com On 7/10/06, Robert D. Baron <rbaron@concentric.net> wrote: > > I just noticed an online Q&A with Assistant Managing Editor for > Photography Michele McNally at > http://www.nytimes.com/ref/business/media/asktheeditors.html . > > In response to a query from an amateur photographer who asks about the > equipment the NYT photographers use, she says: > > > A. Yes, all of our photographers are equipped digitally. We currently > > use Canon 35mm Mark II's and D5's with a variety of lenses from 10mm > > to 600 mm. We have Hasselblad large format equipment that shoots > > film. > > > Now, am I being overly sensitive when I read something like this? > > I have to wonder how they convert the Canon 35mm images to digital, and > where they found large format instead of medium format Hasselblads. > > Maybe I'm just being overly picky. > > And maybe she doesn't need to know what equipment her staff is using > because she has a great eye for composition and news value. > > Anyone with knowledge of the newspaper business care to chime in here? > > --Bob > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >