Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Nathan, I appreciate your taking the discussion seriously ;-). However, I think the questions (and answers) would only be useful when discussing a specific posted image (as opposed to broad answers as to why we photograph). P.S. 6. "Why did you post "this" image?" It may be interesting to actually answer these questions when we post ;-) or not ;-) For example: http://www.imagist.com/why I found this subject odd and slightly humorous. I thought it visually interesting. I wished that I had the 100 apo macro, but didn't and ended up having to crop from a much looser frame. I think the first one is a better composition than the second. I also think they both appear slightly flat on my monitors. Are these both interesting photos? Is one less mediocre than the other? Does anyone else find them interesting or slightly humorous? Regards, George Lottermoser george@imagist.com On Jun 29, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > I am sorry I cannot be more intellectual than this.