Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Inkjet prints, on an Epson 1280. They have a clarity that I cannot reproduce on the screen. I have a photo of a Mardi Gras Indian that truly remarkable. Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA http://www.400tx.com http://400tx.blogspot.com/ -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Richard Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 2:15 AM To: Leica Users Group; 'Leica Users Group' Subject: RE: [Leica] Jeffery PAW 24 AND 777 developer - my initial results Hi Jeff, at 1:46PM, you wrote: **** I suspect that 777 is not nearly as magical as its legend would make it. It would have to really show me a benefit over other readily-available developers to make me decided to keep ordering it from Canada and experimenting to find good developing times. **** At 7:24PM, you wrote **** N.B. - This 777 is better than I thought it would be. I'm not sure that any other one developer is its equal. For what it's worth, the printed images look 100% better than the screen shots of the same scan. For my money, the prints look better than those developed in D-76 1:1, the so-called "standard" for comparing developers. **** I guess between 1:46 and 7:24PM, you made some prints and it's making you a believer? :-) Analog or inkjet prints? // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com) _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information