Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The software that accompanies the RD-1 has a provision for the correction of the effects of vignetting. I assume Epson calculated that a 15mm lens would vignette so much, a 21 this much, and a 24 that much, etc., and provided image correcting software accordingly. As far as I can see, it works quite well. Now, it seems suddenly, Leica says, "Oh, by the way, you might want to have these bar codes put on the inner face of your M-lenses so you can capture data that tells you which lens was used." There is more than a veiled implication that this will also impact image quality because Leica's statement said that these codes would "help optimize image quality". Further, they stated that owners of lenses produced after July 1, would "benefit from the image optimization" resulting from the retrofit application of these bar codes. So there appears to be more at stake that just adding metadata and there seems to be a clear suggestion from Solms that one had better get the bar codes put on pre July 1, 2006, lenses or live with some pretty expensive junk. It sounds as if they've invented a Leica M that in fact cannot use older lenses without some lack of image optimization. Or, is this their solution to the Vignetting problem and rather than take the Epson route by fixing the vignetting in software, they have seen this as a profit improvement program? I would think that lots of lenses at 95 Euros each results and a significant Euro flow Please, someone tell me I've misread Leica's statement. Ed Kowaleski