Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]William - So were not going to get individual (i.e., one at a time) frame line selection? Too bad. A missed opportunity. :-( (I did suggest this in an earlier e-mail.) Dick >Clive, > >It is not "essential", but there is a reason beyond the metadata >None here have yet guessed it. > >Although menu entry was suggested some months back, that >option would appear to be impractical. This was confirmed at >the Forum meeting in Solms last weekend. > >William > >At 08:07 AM 6/14/2006 -0500, you wrote: >>It is not clear to me why the code on the lens is a requirement. It is >>trivial to provide menu based entry to identify the lens on the >>camera - unless they intend to test every lens and characterise its >>performance. I doubt they will do that - 8 bits would not be enough. >> >>I can use any old Nikon F-mount lens on the D200 by entering its >>maximum aperture and focal length. >> >>95 euros for six dots is Leica type pricing - preposterous (unless >>they throw in a CLA) >> >>On 6/6/06, lambroving@att.net <lambroving@att.net> wrote: >>... >>>http://www.leica-camera.com/imperia/md/content/pdf/objektive/18.pdf >>... >> >>-- >>Clive >>http://clive.moss.net/blog > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information