Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/06/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Marc, comments on a LTM Schneider Xenogon 35mm F2.8
From: langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer)
Date: Tue Jun 13 08:40:13 2006
References: <9b678e0606121911g62c8d9fah347535d105c7b894@mail.gmail.com> <3.0.2.32.20060612233826.029cdd38@pop.infionline.net> <9b678e0606130508h6c06bfn47f46876ef0ce486@mail.gmail.com> <3.0.2.32.20060613111522.02a252b4@pop.infionline.net>
I had one of these lenses that I picked up very cheaply -- someone gave it
to me along with an unusable Summar. I sold it after shooting a few rolls.
It was a decent performer, but seemed to be selling for way more than I
thought it was worth, so I flogged it either here or on IDCC and got a 35/2
Canon instead with the money I made. I think that the Canon is a better, if
less unusual lens
Mark
In reply to:
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Marc, comments on a LTM Schneider Xenogon 35mm F2.8)
Message from msmall at aya.yale.edu (Marc James Small) ([Leica] Marc, comments on a LTM Schneider Xenogon 35mm F2.8)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Marc, comments on a LTM Schneider Xenogon 35mm F2.8)
Message from msmall at aya.yale.edu (Marc James Small) ([Leica] Marc, comments on a LTM Schneider Xenogon 35mm F2.8)