Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: WAS [Leica] question...NOW: LUG photo quality, etc.
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Thu Jun 8 15:33:47 2006
References: <4a2.2788140.31b994ad@aol.com> <7A55BF49-4DCE-4A84-B5C0-D21967DCB2C5@mac.com> <448896AB.7060505@adrenaline.com> <94B7222DAB20E8E670E22477@scarborough.isc.org>
 
On Jun 8, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Brian Reid wrote:

>
>>> It's a great place to learn, and a great place to show.  What more
>>> could we want?
>
> Full-frame Digital M?
> To look up and see Steve Barbour when our grandchild ends up in the  
> emergency room in Phoenix?

you are too funny,

and kind as well....

(scary thought but fortunately, we have much better than me)

:-)

Steve



> Developer that doesn't go bad if you leave it until next weekend.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] question...)
Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) (WAS [Leica] question...NOW: LUG photo quality, etc.)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) (WAS [Leica] question...NOW: LUG photo quality, etc.)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) (WAS [Leica] question...NOW: LUG photo quality, etc.)