Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/06/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: WAS [Leica] question...NOW: LUG photo quality, etc.
From: reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid)
Date: Thu Jun 8 15:01:38 2006
References: <4a2.2788140.31b994ad@aol.com> <7A55BF49-4DCE-4A84-B5C0-D21967DCB2C5@mac.com> <448896AB.7060505@adrenaline.com>
>> It's a great place to learn, and a great place to show. What more
>> could we want?
Full-frame Digital M?
To look up and see Steve Barbour when our grandchild ends up in the
emergency room in Phoenix?
Developer that doesn't go bad if you leave it until next weekend.
Replies:
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) (WAS [Leica] question...NOW: LUG photo quality, etc.)
In reply to:
Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] question...)
Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) (WAS [Leica] question...NOW: LUG photo quality, etc.)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) (WAS [Leica] question...NOW: LUG photo quality, etc.)