Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 90mm's
From: raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K)
Date: Tue Jun 6 13:07:49 2006
References: <042201c688e8$29f01d30$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <a2f8f4470606061045v621b3556v22b0f661e2f9c8a1@mail.gmail.com>

It is sharp but extremely prone to flare. The big hood 12575 (also for 
4/135) will fit but does not cure the problem completely.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Daniel Ridings" <dlridings@gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] 90mm's


> Sorry, no fat one.
>
> But I am seriously considering a skinny one.
>
> I used a Tele-Elmarit (Canadian) sporadically in the 70'ies (it wasn't
> mine). I remember it being very sharp, even wide-open.
>
> Then I hear others saying it is so-so. Is this one of the lenses with
> a lot of sample variation?
>
> Daniel
>
> On 6/5/06, Christopher Williams <leicachris@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>> Jeff Smith got the 90mm discussion rolling a few weeks ago. I have a
>> 90/f2, 90/2.8 and now have a 90/2.8 "Fat" Tele. I know SonC had good
>> results with this lens so I hope to try it out this week. Any other "Fat"
>> users?
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] 90mm's)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] 90mm's)