Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 90mm's
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Tue Jun 6 10:45:49 2006
References: <042201c688e8$29f01d30$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto>
 
Sorry, no fat one.

But I am seriously considering a skinny one.

I used a Tele-Elmarit (Canadian) sporadically in the 70'ies (it wasn't
mine). I remember it being very sharp, even wide-open.

Then I hear others saying it is so-so. Is this one of the lenses with
a lot of sample variation?

Daniel

On 6/5/06, Christopher Williams <leicachris@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> Jeff Smith got the 90mm discussion rolling a few weeks ago. I have a 
> 90/f2, 90/2.8 and now have a 90/2.8 "Fat" Tele. I know SonC had good 
> results with this lens so I hope to try it out this week. Any other "Fat" 
> users?
>
> Chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from vintagebill at verizon.net (bill harting) ([Leica] 90mm's)
Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] 90mm's)
Reply from raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K) ([Leica] 90mm's)
 In reply to: Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] 90mm's)