Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for the education. Interesting. Ric Carter http://gallery.leica-users.org/Passing-Fancies On Jun 2, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote: > > This is a long post with only minimal photographic relevance but I > hope it will correct some misinformation recently posted. I did use > a Leica camera to take many pictures in Norway, including many > shots of the Fram and Geoa, which I will post shortly. So please > forgive me for wasting bandwidth. > > During a uncomfortable portion of my obligatory military service > stint I was stationed in Ft. Churchill, Canada. Winter temperatures > ranged down to 50 below zero and your spit would freeze before it > hit the ground. When it was really cold, it would explode with a > loud cracking sound before it hit. During the long winter night, > our main entertainments were shooing polar bears away from the > garbage dump and reading the books in the base library. They had a > magnificent collection of books on Artic exploration. All we needed > to do to experience the rigors of winter in the north country was > to walk from the mess hall to the barracks. Baby, it was cold > outside. Fortunately we had mechanized Snow Tracs to get around but > some of the locals still used dog sleds. About an hour of sledding > in sub zero weather was all I could handle. How the explorers could > do it for 12 hours a day is more than I can imagine. The only > upside of my experience was that I learned to cross country ski, a > sport which I have now practiced for over 40 years. Why Scott > didn't ski to the pole is beyond me. > > Now about the use of motorized sledges on Scott's Tera Nova > expedition, Michael Barne, a veteran of the DISCOVERY EXPEDITION, > had designed a new sledge. Although these sledges failed on their > initial tryout in Norway, Scott took them with him to the Antartic, > hoping to use them to ferry large amounts of supplies to depots. He > planned to use ponies to dash for the pole, man hauling the sleds > for only the final lap. The first two motor sledges were unloaded > and immediately put to work hauling stores to the new camp. As the > third, and largest, sledge was unloaded and hauled by twenty men > towards the shore, it broke through the ice and sank in sixty > fathoms of seawater. > > On the initial days of transfering supplies to depots nearer to the > pole, one machine gave out just beyond Safety Camp while the other > had to be abandoned a mile beyond Corner Camp. Scott's reliance on > ponies was also misguided. The ponies would prove an equally weak > link. It is true that Shackleton took nineteen ponies with him on > his NIMROD EXPEDITION, but only four survived to set out on the > journey towards the Pole. Of these, one had to be shot at the > second depot; another gave up > at the third; and by the time they reached the foot of the > Beardmore Glacier only one was left. That one fell into a crevace. > Had the weather not been unusually mild, Shackleton would had > suffered as badly as Scott. He made the right decision to return > 100 miles short of the Pole. > > Amundsen, a very experienced Arctic explorer despite his character > flaws, had lived with the Esquimos and was well acquainted with the > rigors of overland Artic travel. His use of dogs and skis was > exactly right. The final dash to the Pole was largely without > incident. One of the reasons that he was reviled in the English > press is that HE ATE HIS DOGS as the load lightened. Or rather he > fed them to the remaining dogs. Unlike Indonesians, a proper > Englishman would as soon eat a dog as a Hindu would eat a cow. I > can testify that letters protesting Amundsen's butchery still come > into the London Times on the anniversary of Scott's death. > > My wife is Norwegian and comes from a sailing and shipyard family - > so every time we visit her home country we get a full rundown on > the lives and loves of the various explorers. Seems they were all a > pretty raunchy bunch, although gifted in many ways. As far as the > Norwegians are concerned, Nansen is at the top of the heap. But not > for his exploration. He was Norwegian cross country skiing champion > for eight years in a row and as an 18 year old set a speed skating > record for the mile. In Norway, ski champions are Tiger Woods, Babe > Ruth, Wayne Gretsky and Michael Jordan rolled into one. Nansen > trained as a neuro physiologist and published frequently in medical > journals. He was the first to cross Greenland on skis. He was a > staunch patriot and was instrumental in freeing Norway from Swedish > domination. Nansen was Norway's first ambassador to London. Finally > he won the Nobel Prize for his work with Russian refugees after > WW1. Who cares if he bonked Kathleen Scott, even through, at the > time, he was married and had several children. Certainly not the > Norwegians. Unfortunately he never reached either pole. > > Amundsen is grudgingly given second place in Norway's pantheon of > polar explorers although, objectively speaking, his exploration > record is significantly greater than Nansen's. He was the first to > complete the Northern Passage, drifting and sailing from the North > Sea to the Bering Strait in a boat not much larger than my own > Willard motorsailer. The boat, the Geoa is on display outside the > Fram Museum. Inside the museum is, of course the Fram. The boat > that Nansen had constructed to sail to the North Pole and Amundsen > borrowed for his South Pole exploration. Amundsen's expedtion to > the South Pole was masterfully planned and executed. More > important, he succeeded while the much more elaborate Scott venture > failed. Norwegians tend to ignore the fact that he defrauded his > backers, violated his promise to Nansen, and had a very abrasive > personality that annoyed most of those who befriended him. In 1928 > he died with his mucklucks on attempting to rescue the ill fated > Nobile "Italia" airship expedition to the North Pole. A fitting > passing. > > Shackleton seems to occupy a unique place in the annals of polar > exploration. At least according to the Norwegian scholars I met. He > is regarded as a man of unsurpassed courage, great leadership > ability but a lousy explorer. He was blessed with amazing luck > where it really counted. As a sailor, I am most impressed with his > 800 mile voyage though the Southern Ocean in a boat that I would > find unsuitable for an afternoon trip in the Irish Sea. On the > other hand, many would question the poor planning that led to the > loss of the Endurance and made such a sea voyage necessary. > Incidentally, Shackleton is not to be credited with the amazing > photos of the Endurance expedition. He wanted to abandon the heavy > glass plates and movie film. All credit must be given to Australian > photographer Frank Hurley who risked his life rescuing the films > from the sinking hull of the Endurance. He later convinced > Shackleton that the photos would be the only record of the failed > voyage. > > A few years ago, my birthday gift from my kids was a coffee table > book "South with the Endurance", a beautifully printed collection > of Frank Hurley's photographs of the voyage. If you don't have it, > you should get it. > > Scott is now regarded, at least in Norway, as the flip side of > Amundsen and Shackleton. A poor planner, an inept explorer, an > incompetent leader, and unlucky to boot. He is regarded as a > necessary contrast to the better qualities of the other guys. But > the Brits still revere him. > > Regards, > > > Larry Z > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information