Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 50 mm lenses
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor)
Date: Wed May 24 10:55:27 2006
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B366BABF0@case-email>

Dave - Went to look but the page comes up empty.  :-(

>Here are four images that I think show the versatility of the 50/2.8
>Elmar (new style). These I took of a friend of mine on a business trip
>in NYC several weeks ago.
>
>http://www.purplehen.com/nyc/index.HTM
>
>The 50/2.8 is the only lens I took on the trip. Film was BW400CN
>processed and scanned by Walmart. These are straight off the CD
>(downsampled for size only).
>
>I'm impressed by the Frontier scans. I scanned one neg with my Minolta
>5400. I was able to make a very nice 11x14 print with that. Still the
>low res Frontier scans are great for digital presentation and proofing.
>
>
>I really like the way the Elmar renders OOF areas. It's not something
>you can duplicate with Gaussian blur in PS.
>
>BTW, I'm surprised the night shots even turned out. We'd just come from
>having a few beers at a local tavern. I learned long ago that methanol
>can thwart focusing ability and steadiness of hand. Photography rule
>#27, don't drink if you think you'll happen across a Hindenburg moment.
>Well, this wasn't the Hindenburg, but further testament that the 50/2.8
>is easy lens to focus and otherwise handle.
>
>I haven't used my 50 'lux since I bought the Elmar.
>
>daveR
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


-- 
Regards,

Dick

In reply to: Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] 50 mm lenses)