Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/05/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Do I want a 35 'lux?
From: msmall at infionline.net (Marc James Small)
Date: Mon May 15 18:53:06 2006
References: <3.0.2.32.20060515183059.025cf0a8@pop.infionline.net> <FE959031-0E64-4E4D-B65C-018B409AC0D7@mindspring.com> <9b678e0605151515m3ddb38cfp7199382d9498fdbb@mail.gmail.com> <3.0.2.32.20060515183059.025cf0a8@pop.infionline.net>
At 06:50 PM 5/15/06 -0400, Don Dory wrote:
>Marc,
>You could be correct that I had a bad sample. Stopped down by F4 it was
>quite good but all of my shots at 1.4 to 2 were soft. At this point I would
>not go back to the old formula as the new one is so good.
I agree completely. I sold my pre-ASPH 1.4/35 to the fellow from whom I
had purchased it, and at a premium, and invested in the new lens, which I
dearly love.
Marc
msmall@aya.yale.edu
Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!
In reply to:
Message from msmall at infionline.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] Do I want a 35 'lux?)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Do I want a 35 'lux?)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Do I want a 35 'lux?)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Do I want a 35 'lux?)