Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Thu May 11 11:24:10 2006
References: <30461819.1147361644178.JavaMail.root@centrmwml03.mgt.cox.net> <ceb1a5650605110837md5e9639yeb7ccfcb26a84866@mail.gmail.com> <446362BE.4050408@eth.net> <44637B46.7060506@waltjohnson.com> <a2f8f4470605111101i7310098bo804370e084c7dfc3@mail.gmail.com>

I managed to learn one of two things during  years of buying and using 
Nikon gear. Found I'd rather shoot 1/30 @ f2 than 1/60 @ f1.4. Not only 
did I have more money for film, I had a lens with fewer aberrations.

Walt

Daniel Ridings wrote:

> About 6 months ago I couldn't pass one up (the pre-AI version) for 30
> dollars. Kind of fun to play with. Makes me sympathize with those who
> want their 1.4 Summiluxes.
>
> Daniel
>
> On 5/11/06, Walt Johnson <walt@waltjohnson.com> wrote:
>
>> I just bought a used (but new in box) Nikkor AIS 50mm 1.4 for 70
>> dollars.  ;-)
>>
>> Walt
>>
>> Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
>>
>> > Mark,
>> > You must be joking!!
>> >
>> > B&H prices:
>> >
>> > 50mm f1.4AIS  Nikkor is US$300 US Guarantee.(ithe AF version will be
>> > cheaper)
>> > 50mm Summicron-M is US$1495 US Guarantee.
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> > Jayanand
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Mark Langer wrote:
>> >
>> >> In that case, I'm surprised that the ubiquitous Jupiter 3 50mm f1.5
>> >> hasn't
>> >> come up, which is a lot of lens for the money.  Or the Nikkor 50mm 
>> f1.4,
>> >> although with that lens you are getting into the Summicron price 
>> range.
>> >>
>> >> On 5/11/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> I laid out the criteria in the original email posting. I guess I was
>> >>> looking for "best" as the one lens that could be the best 
>> compromise of
>> >>> features, like D76 and Tri-X, rather than the best at doing one 
>> thing.
>> >>> --
>> >>> Jeffery
>> >>>
>> >>> -
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Leica Users Group.
>> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Leica Users Group.
>> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


Replies: Reply from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
Reply from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
Reply from msmall at aya.yale.edu (Marc James Small) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
Message from langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)