Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] romanian rip-off?
From: faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman)
Date: Wed May 10 13:28:38 2006
References: <22088094.1147267660497.JavaMail.root@centrmwml03.mgt.cox.net> <82c9dd70605100644w61147d6fx7c3425f58354f460@mail.gmail.com> <324F476E-6EB3-475B-955C-ADE5E763717A@pandora.be> <005001c6746e$7c96ccc0$3368010a@tci.toledoclinic.com>
 
can a I get a world-wide groan?


On 5/10/06, Howard L Ritter, Jr <hlritter@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> Well, it IS a double-Gauss design!
>
> --howard
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Philippe Orlent" <philippe.orlent@pandora.be>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] romanian rip-off?
>
>
> > Sounds logical. The 50 at the top of the gaussian curve :-)
> >
> >
> > Op 10-mei-06, om 15:44 heeft Eric Korenman het volgende geschreven:
> >
> >> Throughout the years, if you plot my lens use swings, the peak of
> >> the bell
> >> curve is the 50mm focal length (with f min= 21mm,  f max= 135mm)
> >>
> >> Eric
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] romanian rip-off?)
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] romanian rip-off?)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] romanian rip-off?)
Message from hlritter at mindspring.com (Howard L Ritter, Jr) ([Leica] romanian rip-off?)