Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] romanian rip-off?
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Wed May 10 11:48:46 2006
References: <22088094.1147267660497.JavaMail.root@centrmwml03.mgt.cox.net> <82c9dd70605100644w61147d6fx7c3425f58354f460@mail.gmail.com>

Sounds logical. The 50 at the top of the gaussian curve :-)


Op 10-mei-06, om 15:44 heeft Eric Korenman het volgende geschreven:

> Throughout the years, if you plot my lens use swings, the peak of  
> the bell
> curve is the 50mm focal length (with f min= 21mm,  f max= 135mm)
>
> Eric
>
>
> On 5/10/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Gasp!.............Must...............buy...............another....... 
>> .........50.................
>>
>> At 06:14 AM 5/10/2006, you wrote:
>>
>> Go for it Jeffery! You need another 50, don't you?
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from hlritter at mindspring.com (Howard L Ritter, Jr) ([Leica] romanian rip-off?)
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] romanian rip-off?)
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] romanian rip-off?)