Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Don's PAW 16 Priorities and Permanence
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Sun Apr 23 14:32:52 2006
References: <9b678e0604231126s70da9a80r3b13e10053444db2@mail.gmail.com> <002a01c66704$fd7d8670$8d6b4f51@GeeBee> <9b678e0604231154h1250d3eby3c08264807dd3260@mail.gmail.com> <120E4626-EA71-4DBF-9EBD-9191D6279C8C@pandora.be>

Philippe,
Thank you for the insights on work flow.  I had just about decided that the
way to fix the branch would be to do the corrections, then flatten the image
then work on the branches.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 4/23/06, Philippe Orlent <philippe.orlent@pandora.be> wrote:
>
> I looked at it earlier on, and decided to wait a bit before
> commenting, as I ofeten do with image that strike me.
> Graham had a point, but keeping the grain natural in this kind of
> situation is not easy at all.
> Personally, I tend to remove grain first all over the image, then
> clone, then heal, and then re-add grain/noise (in several steps most
> of the time).
> Now, personally, I would have left the branches in. But I would have
> cloned the 'dead' leaf out.
>
> Nevertheless a truly striking image, showing your seeing talent: even
> if there('s not much there, you make someting great of it.
>
> Thanks for showing,
> Philippe
>
> Op 23-apr-06, om 20:54 heeft Don Dory het volgende geschreven:
>
> > Graham,
> > This is the original version that I stared at for a few days.
> >
> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/album337/leafskylineII
> >
> > Don
> > don.dory@gmail.com
> >
> >
> > On 4/23/06, GeeBee <graham@geebeespaw.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: "Don Dory" <don.dory@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Subject: [Leica] Don's PAW 16 Priorities and Permanence
> >>
> >>
> >> I was out with the 75 Summilux trying to do people pictures but
> >> ended up
> >> with this:
> >>
> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/album337/leafskyline
> >>
> >> Neopan 400 no filters M6
> >>
> >> Don
> >> don.dory@gmail.com
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -------
> >>
> >> Hi Don,
> >>
> >> I really like that! I am well acquainted with the theory that
> >> there is
> >> nothing new under the sun but I don't recall ever seeing anything
> >> like
> >> that.
> >> If I have, it obviously wasn't done as well or it would have
> >> registered.
> >>
> >> My only nit pick is that it looks like a bit of cloning or
> >> somesuch has
> >> been
> >> done top right and could use a little more work to hide it but it
> >> cannot
> >> negate the wow! factor that I got on first viewing.
> >>
> >> --Graham
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Don's PAW 16 Priorities and Permanence)
Message from graham at geebeespaw.freeserve.co.uk (GeeBee) ([Leica] Don's PAW 16 Priorities and Permanence)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Don's PAW 16 Priorities and Permanence)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Don's PAW 16 Priorities and Permanence)