[Leica] An informal test of my 50/1.5 Zeiss Sonnar (on aContaxIia)

[jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith)]

Thanks for the link. He looks good.

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com




-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Don Dory
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 9:07 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] An informal test of my 50/1.5 Zeiss Sonnar (on
aContaxIia)


Jeffery,
He is not cheap, but give him a go.

http://www.zeisscamera.com/ContaxIIa/Prices.html

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 3/30/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:
>
> You're right. The end of her sleeve seems to be in focus. Well, where 
> the heck can I get a Contax IIa rangefinder adjusted? The only camera 
> repair guy in town seems to have been Katrina'ed into retirement.
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
> Don Dory
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 8:27 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] An informal test of my 50/1.5 Zeiss Sonnar (on a
> ContaxIia)
>
>
> Jeffery,
> If you look at Susan you will see that part of her sweater looks very 
> sharp. I suspect the focus was off either because the RF is just a 
> little off or that you just missed by a hair.  My Sonnar is pretty 
> sharp at 1.5 in the dead center few mm and then loses it toward the 
> edges.  If you can put your
> main subject in the middle it looks very good.
>
> Don
> don.dory@gmail.com
>
>
> On 3/30/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> > I have never seriously used my 50/1.5 Sonnar because my Contax IIa 
> > isn't terribly light-tight and its rangefinder is out of vertical 
> > alignment. However, having just bought a 50/1.5 Sonnar in Leica LTM 
> > mount, I tried to see what the lens could do. I don't have any of 
> > the fancy equipment that Erwin Puts has, so my lens test consists 
> > primarily of walking around the campus annoying people under 
> > different lighting situations. Here are four shots from that roll of 
> > Tri-X.
> >
> > http://www.400tx.com/Susan.html f/1.5 
> > http://www.400tx.com/Michael.html f/2.0 
> > http://www.400tx.com/Thomas.html  f/4 
> > http://www.400tx.com/Phillip.html f/5.6
> >
> > My knee-jerk reaction is that it is a pretty good lens with nice 
> > bokeh, but isn't razor sharp wide open (Susan may be blurry because 
> > I was at 1/50). So, it gives me pretty much what my Summarit and 
> > Canon 50/1.2 lens give me wide
> > open...less than stellar images. However, closed down just a stop it
> > starts
> > performing fairly well.
> >
> > Jeffery Smith
> > New Orleans, LA
> > http://www.400tx.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information