Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Feli, I have never seen a Lightjet print ................ many from the Fuji 3000 and 4000 machines (fantastic quality in A4 and A3) but still expensive. The description on the web indicates excellent/ exceptional quality for Lightjet. Perhaps you need first to determine for what the prints are intended .............. and then examine further. Last week, I received the Epson man with a 700 scanner and the 2400. The scans, 6x6 and 35mm were great ............... and the prints, A3, from the 6x6 scans very very pleasing. Just the simple selection of the basic menu function was completed ............ no PS wizardry! Recommendation ............... take a couple of good scans or digital images to your dealer/shop and have them print for you .............. then you'll know. That's what dealers are for ............. they need to earn their money .............. however, please don't go and order via the web afterwards to save a couple of bucks. Happy searching, B. On 30-mrt-2006, at 20:57, feli wrote: > Any opinions on how these two stack up against each other in terms > of b/w > output quality? > > I have to make a large run of prints, and I am getting to the point > where I could > buy a 2400 for the cost of sending everything to a Lightjet. If the > quality from the > 2400 is the same or better on glossy paper, then I need to weigh > the economic > factor in making this decision. > > > > thanks, > > Feli > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------------- > Feli di Giorgio feli2@earthlink.net > www.elanphotos.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information