Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] enough with Olympus DSLR postings PLEASE
From: jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Mon Mar 20 08:46:16 2006

I'm trying to emulate his technical (non-artistic) routines. Whether I can 
emulate his artistic side is a bit out of my reach. But I do like the "look" 
of his and Capa's images, so I'm searching around for some vintage lenses. I 
was considering getting an old 50/3.5 Elmar and am glad that I didn't. The 
elements are too small for John Van Stelten to polish! Right now, the 50/3.5 
Heliar is closest to the retro look in a contemporary lens.

Jeffery

> 
> From: Walt Johnson <walt@waltjohnson.com>
> Date: 2006/03/20 Mon AM 11:32:23 EST
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] enough with Olympus DSLR postings PLEASE
> 
> Jeffery:
> 
> Two bags of 777 ? Does that mean you're going to start posting a few 
> Cartier-Bresson shots?
> 
> Walt   
> 
> 
> 
> Jeffery Smith wrote:
> 
> >People will talk wherever there is the largest audience. An Olympus 
> >Enthusiast Group is not going to be that.
> >
> >This always happens where there is really nothing new going on in the 
> >Leica factory. But I am really more interested in the old Leica stuff 
> >(who can afford an asph 50/1.4 Summilux?).
> >
> >At the moment, I'm actually content to pump Daniel Ridings for 
> >information on film and development. I just got two bags of 777 developer 
> >in the mail. And I don't remember if I ordered a bunch of Fortepan or 
> >Fomapan. For some reason, I had the two as being synonymous in my brain. 
> >Sheesh. Who has time to talk about Olympus digitals?
> >
> >Jeffery Smith
> >
> >  
> >
> >>From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net>
> >>Date: 2006/03/20 Mon AM 09:24:57 EST> To: "Leica Users Group" 
> >><lug@leica-users.org>
> >>Subject: RE: [Leica] enough with Olympus DSLR postings PLEASE
> >>
> >>Gee, and all I want is film based discussion.  Some guys are really 
> >>pushing
> >>their luck......
> >>
> >>Frank Filippone> red735i@earthlink.net
> >>
> >>David Keenan wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Cripes sakes.
> >>>
> >>>I subscribed to this UG for information on Leica.
> >>>
> >>>Now more then 3/4 of the postings are related to Olympus.
> >>>
> >>>I don't care if there is ONE Leica lens for this camera. These postings
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>belong in a UG for users of Olympus cameras.
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Please, y'all, lets stay on-topic for users of Leica cameras. (I could
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>mention other recent long OFF-TOPIC threads herein but I hope my point 
> >>has
> >>been made.)
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Dave.
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Leica Users Group.
> >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Jeffery
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Leica Users Group.
> >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] enough with Olympus DSLR postings PLEASE)