Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM
From: jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Sun Mar 12 17:58:43 2006
References: <4413E8A5.2090209@summaventures.com> <"000001c645e2$e0b93f40$656c0 e44"@newukolbqveo9i> <a2f8f4470603121245o5f7de0dy610ef36ad73690e@mail.gmail.com>
 
Daniel,
That lens seems to be a bargain. Is there a reliable source to buy them 
from, or is it a lottery?
Cheers
Jayanand

Daniel Ridings wrote:

>On 3/12/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Right now, I'm pursuing the 35/2.8, which is more of a challenge than the
>>35/3.5.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>You want the classic b/w cream of the crop 35/2.8?
>
>$60 will get you a Jupiter-12. I seriously doubt that the Summaron
>35/2.8 would be as good, and at any rate it would absolutely not be
>better.
>
>http://gallery.leica-users.org/album08/05v35_0019
>http://gallery.leica-users.org/album08/05v35_0024 (very close to wide-open)
>
>Daniel
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>  
>
Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM)
 In reply to: Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM)