Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Shoot it wide open as a portrait lens and see what you think. When the 40/1.4 Nokton came out in a [more expensive] single-coat version, I thought "why not use a Jupiter?" Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA http://www.400tx.com -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Rob McClure Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:42 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Jupiter 8 Russian Lens Comments Sorry, Slip of the finger; it is indeed a 2.0. Rob McClure On Mar 1, 2006, at 10:08 PM, Joe Leung wrote: > Rob, > > Jupiter 8 50/2.8? Is it 50/2? Or, could it be Industar !-61 55/2.8? > > Joe > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+jcyleung8=shaw.ca@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+jcyleung8=shaw.ca@leica-users.org]On Behalf Of Rob > McClure > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 6:34 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] Jupiter 8 Russian Lens Comments > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information