Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have 15, 25, 35 (f2.5), 50 (f1.5) and 90, and
they're all pretty decent indeed.
Nick
--- Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 12, 15, 25, 50 and 75 are all brilliant, although
> the 12mm is rather
> limited in its applications (it is great for
> panoramas cropped out of
> full frames)
> cheers
> Douglas
>
> Rob Pritchett wrote:
>
> > Good day, and a very happy Saturday to all...
> >
> > Having 'liquidated' my Lecia collection some years
> ago (to fund my
> > childrens' trip through private high school), I am
> left with only my
> > trusty M2 and a couple of lenses... 50mm 2.8 Elmar
> (old version) and
> > the obligatory 35mm Summicron.
> >
> > Having been very fond of my 21mm 2.8 Super
> Angular, I am interested
> > in diving back into the 'super wide' arena but
> simply cannot justify
> > the outlay for a replacement for my
> now-on-somebody-else's-camera SA.
> > I have been thinking of the VC 21mm, as it seems
> to be an acceptable
> > substitute.
> >
> > So, I was wondering if any (or many) on this list
> were regular VC
> > users - 21mm or otherwise - and what your words of
> wisdom might be in
> > the regards these lenses.
> >
> > Thank you very much for your time and kind
> consideration.
> >
> > Rob Pritchett
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug
> for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for
> more information
>
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Photos ? NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a
photo http://uk.photos.yahoo.com