Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not just the transport costs, but also the LUGging cost of all that stuff to another location ............ B. On 21-feb-2006, at 16:46, Douglas Sharp wrote: > Frank, > For a silver list we'd all have to meet and show each other our > darkroom prints and slides - not a bad idea as such, but a bit > heavy on travelling costs. > When you get down to it, everything being shown on the web is > digital, whether film+scan or sensor recorded - we can't get away > from it. > Douglas > > Frank Filippone wrote: > >> The ultimate digital comment..... >> >> Paraphrased....... Nothing in photogrpahy was worthwhile until >> digital came >> along. >> >> Who is for starting a LUG-Silver list? >> >> Frank Filippone >> red735i@earthlink.net >> >> >> >> >> On 2/20/06, Frank Filippone <red735i@earthlink.net> wrote: >> >> >>> B+W wet darkrooms will never be surpassed by digital prints. >>> there is a >>> place for both of them, For the artist, making a few prints, and >>> not >>> selling any of them, wet is where it is at. For the >>> professional, digital >>> may suffice for his clientele. Fine. We can coexist. >>> >> >> And wet prints will never surpass digital. BD has pointed this out so >> many times: they are different beasts. It's like saying apples are >> better than oranges. >> >> I've seen some good stuff done in the wet-darkroom. None of it >> appears >> to be worth the effort that went in to making them :-) >> >> Daniel >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information