Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The economy of film...
From: bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce)
Date: Thu Feb 9 03:47:11 2006
References: <644b626439aa.6439aa644b62@planet.nl>

Just imagine it ..................

Say hi to Peter too.

B.

On 9-feb-2006, at 10:26, nathan.wajsman@planet.nl wrote:

> I am in London right now, and I took the CL and Tri-X for a change.  
> Not
> bad, but (1) I am not sure if I have a bag on my shoulder (can't feel
> the weight) and (2) I cannot seem to find the histogram on the back of
> the CL.
>
> :-)
>
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Almere, Netherlands
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> http://www.fotosevilla.com
> http://www.fotocycle.nl
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
> Print sales: http://www.photodeluge.com
> Image licensing: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman
>
> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> Van: Richard <richard-lists@imagecraft.com>
> Datum: donderdag, februari 9, 2006 8:22 am
> Onderwerp: [Leica] The economy of film...
>
>> I know, I know, go out to make some photographs...
>>
>> One of the factors in digital's favor is cost. The film luddites
>> (*raise
>> hand*) arguments include depreciation of digital equipments and the
>> need to
>> get computer equipments etc. Another argument I have not heard much
>> is the
>> cost of doing B&W prints. I just knocked out an 11x14 print of the
>> Taiko
>> guy for the Taiko classroom, and the cost is pretty much the paper
>> (~$1.20)
>> plus pennies for the chemical. I use a RH Design Analyzer so I
>> didn't waste
>> paper doing test strips (to be fair, the print is slightly light
>> and I
>> would have added another 1/3 stop if I am aiming for higher
>> quality.
>> However, for this purpose, it's good enough). I have a Nova print
>> processor
>> so the chemical last for several weeks. If I use my Epson 1280, the
>> paper
>> is about $2.00 and the B&W MIS ink has to be in the range of $1 or
>> more. I
>> doubt the Epson Ultrachrome ink for the new R2400 is cheaper, so we
>> are
>> looking at 2x the cost per print.
>>
>> I also enjoy the visual feedback with the wet prints, I can change
>> the
>> paper grade and see the noticeable differences on the prints. There
>> is
>> something more immediate about making adjustment with exposure time
>> and
>> paper grade, and then see the results...
>>
>> Not that I am trashing digital of course. All color stuff goes
>> there, and
>> of course it probably would be far easier to do anything beyond
>> basic
>> dodging and burning using Photoshop. Different tools for the
>> different
>> needs....
>>
>> // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly,
>> please
>> use richard at imagecraft.com)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (nathan.wajsman@planet.nl) ([Leica] The economy of film...)