Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Recommendations for an enlarger
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Tue Feb 7 08:16:40 2006
References: <20060207100243.77381.qmail@web25503.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <c8cebae0b5ea189035ea87b6739fd236@ncable.net.au>

Please!

On 2/7/06, Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au> wrote:
> I can give you more details should you wish.
>
> Cheers
> On 07/02/2006, at 21:02, Nick Roberts wrote:
>
> > Thank you, Alastair. I'm in the process of setting up
> > a darkroom again after many years of purely digital
> > printing - not because I'm not happy with the digital
> > process - I am - but just because I want to (I'll
> > probably expand on that elsewhere). I can't really
> > spare the space for more than one enlarger (although
> > they're so cheap s/h these days it's not fincancially
> > out of the question), so it's just a case of deciding
> > if I want to limit myself to printing from 120 and
> > 35mm, both of which I'm reasonably familiar with and
> > which cover 90% of my requirements between them, or if
> > I want to go the whole hog and get the De Vere. You've
> > given me plenty of food for thought!
> >
> > Nick
> >
> > --- Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au> wrote:
> >
> >> Well, compared with the V35 it is cumbersome. No
> >> Autofocus, the
> >> negative holder is OK, but if the neg has a curl at
> >> all, its very hard
> >> to put it in position (6x6 negs especially). I don't
> >> mind the focus
> >> mechanism and the height adjustments are fine, the
> >> light boxes I have
> >> seem good, though the light to illuminate the colour
> >> dials is caput. I
> >> have an Ilford 500 head for b/w and changing it for
> >> the colour is a bit
> >> of a fiddle, quite apart from it being soooo heavy.
> >> The transformers
> >> are large, the colour head has its own timer, but
> >> I'd prefer to be able
> >> to use my Jobo 7000 to set it off. The Ilford head
> >> produces enough heat
> >> to melt the poles (not Devere's fault I realize).
> >> Changing neg size
> >> involves changing the carrier plates, and if you are
> >> not careful, you
> >> "lose" the top plate when pulling it out (mine is
> >> now glass, so I've
> >> taped the hole to stop me doing this again) Changing
> >> neg sizes requires
> >> using differing light boxes - no big deal, but you
> >> have to have
> >> somewhere to store them.
> >>
> >> In reality, I enjoy using it and the results are
> >> fine, but its not a
> >> fast easy solution, and I would not use it for 35mm
> >> often.
> >>
> >> My only comparison was a Durst  6x6 enlarger, which
> >> was less "fussy".
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___________________________________________________________
> > Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now.
> > http://www.yahoo.co.uk/blackberry
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> Alastair
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from nickbroberts at yahoo.co.uk (Nick Roberts) ([Leica] Recommendations for an enlarger)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Recommendations for an enlarger)