Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 'Blad question
From: bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce)
Date: Wed Jan 18 14:23:31 2006
References: <6.1.0.6.2.20060114232020.0ab9def8@192.168.100.42><a2f8f4470601162356g42d2 fa6fldda833efed1aa200@mail.gmail.com><C203BD81-28D5-42DB-B678-C1FA5C9E671F @ralgo.nl><43CD59EF.7030106@planet.nl><783fc3da6820c4d500b6bc1fa404bf4c@nc able.net.au> <013a01c61c25$363a0ea0$1529e652@athlon64> <p06001002bff451c483c2@gpsy.com>
 
Hi Karen,

Many thanks .................. fills me in on many details I've  
neglected to quantify in the last years.

Greetings,
B.

On 18-jan-2006, at 21:13, Karen Nakamura wrote:

>
> At 0:49 PM +0100 06.1.18, Daniel Rocha wrote:
>> Alastair Firkin wrote:
>>> Now, its off topic, but I'd like to canvas opinions on the 203FE
>>> versus the 205TCC blad. Which one, problems etc. Please help:  
>>> private
>>> mail may be better unless other wish to hear.
>
> I've written a page about my experiences with my 203FE, which I love:
>
> http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/Hasselblad200.html
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Karen
>
> -- 
> Karen Nakamura
> http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/
> http://www.photoethnography.com/blog/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] any reasons NOT to get a M Classic bag...)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] any reasons NOT to get a M Classic bag...)
Message from daniel.rocha at free.fr (Daniel Rocha) ([Leica] 'Blad question)
Message from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] 'Blad question)