Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/01/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 'Blad question
From: mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura)
Date: Wed Jan 18 12:13:48 2006
References: <6.1.0.6.2.20060114232020.0ab9def8@192.168.100.42><a2f8f4470601162356g42d2 fa6fldda833efed1aa200@mail.gmail.com><C203BD81-28D5-42DB-B678-C1FA5C9E671F @ralgo.nl><43CD59EF.7030106@planet.nl><783fc3da6820c4d500b6bc1fa404bf4c@nc able.net.au> <013a01c61c25$363a0ea0$1529e652@athlon64>
At 0:49 PM +0100 06.1.18, Daniel Rocha wrote:
>Alastair Firkin wrote:
>>Now, its off topic, but I'd like to canvas opinions on the 203FE
>>versus the 205TCC blad. Which one, problems etc. Please help: private
>>mail may be better unless other wish to hear.
I've written a page about my experiences with my 203FE, which I love:
http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/Hasselblad200.html
Cheers,
Karen
--
Karen Nakamura
http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/
http://www.photoethnography.com/blog/
Replies:
Reply from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] 'Blad question)
Reply from bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce) ([Leica] 'Blad question)
In reply to:
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] any reasons NOT to get a M Classic bag...)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] any reasons NOT to get a M Classic bag...)
Message from daniel.rocha at free.fr (Daniel Rocha) ([Leica] 'Blad question)