Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Was RE: [Leica] DSLR choice - now Zeiss-Ikon
From: billgem at hotmail.com (Bill Marshall)
Date: Thu Jan 12 00:06:39 2006

>"It doesn't have the heft of a Leica M6, and the metal seems less 
>substantial . . ."

Jeffrey, my Zeiss Ikon is built as robustly as my Nikon FM3a & to a much 
higher standard than the Bessa R2 I sold. Zeiss quality control standards 
are very high & insure that this camera will last a long time. It's every 
bit as durable IMO as the Nikon FM series cameras have proven to be. In my 
view, it fits the same niche in relation to a Leica M camera as these FM 
cameras filled in relation to Nikon's professional F series cameras.

It's a mistake IMO to judge build quality by "heft" & weight. The M6, for 
example, is only 3 1/2 ounces heavier than a ZI. Not all that much heavier. 
And where does the weight come from? Mostly from the brass & sinc in the 
bottom, top, & front plates. Zeiss chose magnesium, only available in modern 
alloys for such manufacturing in recent years. Without the weight of brass & 
zinc, magnesium provides a lighter alternative with excellent 
strength-to-weight ratio - among the best in the industry - & the elasticity 
to be equally excellent at absorbing shock. Why choose the extra weight & 
expense of brass & zinc when it's not necessary to meet the need?  However 
the real structural integrity comes not from this external cladding, but 
from the internal body frame. Here both cameras are the same - die-cast 
aluminum.

The superior Leica build quality is in the small details, not in the 
oft-sited "heft," which is simply left over from a time when heavy metals 
were the only choice. In regard to the small details even a modern Leica can 
probably not match the build quality of an M3. Unfortunately, much of the 
manufacturing cost of a Leica is due to hand assembly & a failure to convert 
to more modern production methods, including the use of robotics. 
Nonetheless, a Leica M camera is built to a standard for the most demanding 
professional use - again like a Nikon F2 or F3. A Zeiss Ikon is built to a 
standard for the most demanding use of an advance amateur - like a Nikon FM2 
- &  like the FM2, will in some cases & under certain circumstances be an 
excellent alternative or back-up for pro use.

Bill



Replies: Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) (Was RE: [Leica] DSLR choice - now Zeiss-Ikon)
Reply from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) (Was RE: [Leica] DSLR choice - now Zeiss-Ikon)