Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Underexposure in Tungsten Light
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor)
Date: Tue Jan 10 10:15:42 2006
References: <p06230921bfe96e361e17@[10.0.1.2]><F5A7E4FC-1680-470E-A3FE-A0D3959F8A5C@ma c.com> <p06230900bfe992d90a1f@[10.0.1.2]><014501c6160a$0fe83cc0$2501a8c0@chartert n.net> <p06230900bfe99e661763@[10.0.1.2]> <017701c6160f$472a1aa0$2501a8c0@chartertn.net>

I'll give it a try.  What's your experience with Kodak T-Max (I think) 3200?





>  Thanks John.  Looks like the solution is to shoot ISO 400 film at no
>>  more than ISO 200 and maybe lower.
>>
>>  Everything goes against you in tungsten light.  The meter is more
>>  sensitive and the film less so.
>>
>>  I'm either going to have to get some f1.4 lenses or start using faster
>film.
>
>Although not my fovorite film, Ilford Delta 400 and 3200 have an enhansed
>red sensitivity (on paper) that should, theoretically, make them better at
>seeing tungsten light.  The best I ever used was the now defunct Ilford SFX
>200 which had a red sensitivity almost equal to IR film but without the IR
>graininess.  Ah, but it's no longer available and it wasn't particularly
>fast anyway.  Try a roll of Delta 3200 shot at 1600.  It's grainy but
>functional in the shadows.
>
>JB
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>  >  > Ah, so I'm not alone in this.  Next time I'll derate the film a stop
>>  >>  and let you know what happens.
>>  >>
>>  >>  I've seen the effect on both BW400CN and Fuji Press 400 (color neg).
>>  >>
>>  >
>>  >All normal (not extended red or IR) film emulsions loose sensitivity
>>  >starting at about 620-630mu which means that tungsten illumination, 
>> which
>>  >tends to be reddish orange, is only seen at a lower sensitivity (speed).
>>  >Indeed, normal incandescent lighting needs 1 stop overexposure but some
>weak
>>  >tungsten light may need as much as 2 stops more exposure.  The light
>meter
>>  >sees red better than film does.
>>  >
>>  >JB
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >_______________________________________________
>>  >Leica Users Group.
>>  >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>  --
>>  Regards,
>>
>>  Dick
>>  Boston MA
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Leica Users Group.
>>  See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


-- 
Regards,

Dick

Replies: Reply from jblack at ambio.net (John Black) ([Leica] Underexposure in Tungsten Light)
In reply to: Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] Underexposure in Tungsten Light)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] Underexposure in Tungsten Light)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] Underexposure in Tungsten Light)
Message from jblack at ambio.net (John Black) ([Leica] Underexposure in Tungsten Light)