Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/12/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England)
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Thu Dec 15 16:17:10 2005
References: <38ab93b38acf3a.38acf3a38ab93b@planet.nl> <a2f8f4470512150856r43fc780bl36543491a64292e7@mail.gmail.com> <ceb1a5650512151015t68237122sc1daf17a66157db2@mail.gmail.com> <E2EFB0AD-2941-48D6-A59B-CAE848D7A6D7@pandora.be> <ceb1a5650512151040u73f39fc4r48f23265162a8040@mail.gmail.com>

At 1:40 PM -0500 12/15/05, Mark Langer wrote:
>On 12/15/05, Philippe Orlent <philippe.orlent@pandora.be> wrote:
>>
>>  The 16 year old is the standard version, the Distiller's edition is
>>  probably the selection of better barrels (the convertible version),
>>  and the cask strength is just more alcohol and concentrated taste.
>>  Consider it the same as the difference between pparfum and essence de
>>  parfum.
>>
>>  Is this informed speculation, or based on actually trying these?  I've 
>> had
>examples of "special editions" of whiskies that were not as good as the
>standard version, so as often as not, these can be overpriced marketing
>plans.  I was just curious to see if anyone on this list had actually tasted
>these versions and thought that they were an improvement over the regular 16
>yr. old.
>
>Mark

Hi Mark,

I've tried a number of different years of the Distiller's Edition, 
from 1974 version on, as well as the 12yr. old cask strength, and I 
usually have a bottle of the 16yr. old 'standard' available. It's my 
favourite distillery. :-)

The Distiller's Editions tend to be a bit softer, but they also lose 
some of the  strengths of the 16yr. old as they are a bit too muted. 
The complexity is all there, and might even be a bit greater. The 
12yr old is distinctly younger and not as full bodied. The 16yr. old 
is definitely the best. Also, stay away from things like Murray David 
bottlings. I've never had any of any of my favourite Scotchs from 
them that I liked better than the originals. They all tended to be 
flimsy and dilute in their flavours.

The 12yr. old is about $72CDN here, and the 16yr $93. The Distiller's 
is about $105. In Alberta the 16yr old is about $60, so I usually 
pick some up when I'm there. I found a bottle in the Canary Islands 
some years ago for about $18, but they had only one - might not have 
another for some time. :-)

-- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com

In reply to: Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (nathan.wajsman@planet.nl) ([Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England))
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England))
Message from langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer) ([Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England))
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England))
Message from langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer) ([Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England))