Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/12/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England)
From: langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer)
Date: Thu Dec 15 10:52:18 2005
References: <38ab93b38acf3a.38acf3a38ab93b@planet.nl> <a2f8f4470512150856r43fc780bl36543491a64292e7@mail.gmail.com> <ceb1a5650512151015t68237122sc1daf17a66157db2@mail.gmail.com> <E2EFB0AD-2941-48D6-A59B-CAE848D7A6D7@pandora.be> <ceb1a5650512151040u73f39fc4r48f23265162a8040@mail.gmail.com> <782526D4-6FB2-420C-942C-4E43C1FA5C0E@pandora.be>
On 12/15/05, Philippe Orlent <philippe.orlent@pandora.be> wrote:
>
> informed speculation. not an islay lover myself. more speyside myself.
> but never had a bad cask strength compared to the standard version,
> though.
>
> Well, this is a cask strength 12 yr. old compared to a standard 16 yr.
old. Whiskymag rates the 16 year old higher than the more expensive cask
strength 12 yr. old, but you can't always go by their reviews.
In reply to:
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (nathan.wajsman@planet.nl) ([Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England))
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England))
Message from langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer) ([Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England))
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England))
Message from langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer) ([Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England))
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England))