Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/12/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England)
From: langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer)
Date: Thu Dec 15 10:27:19 2005
References: <23822003.1134671017385.JavaMail.root@elwamui-cypress.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

On 12/15/05, Douglas Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> Mark Langer <langeratcarleton@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The 16 year old Lagavulin in 750 l bottle is $92.15 Can, the Distiller's
> > edition in 750 is $101.15 and the 12year old single malt Islay (at a
> barrel
> > strength of 57.8% alcohol) is $121.40.  What I'm curious about is
> whether
> > the more expensive versions of this are significantly better, and if so,
> in
> > what way?
>
> Beter bokeh.



Does this mean that after having a dram, the bottle looks blurrier with the
barrel proof than with the lower proof 16 yr. old?

Mark

Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re: Lagavulin supplies (WAS: OT: What about England))