[Leica] Digilux-2, Still a Contender

[msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)]

what a turn around BD, u yse to be all jpg
On 11/26/05, B. D. Colen <bdcolen@comcast.net> wrote:
> I hate to say it, Martin - and this has nothing whatever to do with the
> digilux - but not shooting raw is akin to shooting Polaroid, and I don't
> mean Polaroid negative either. ;-)
>
>
>
> On 11/26/05 7:02 PM, "Martin Krieger" <krieger@usc.edu> wrote:
>
> > Is the Digilux-2 still a contender, now 2+ years after it was introduced?
> > What makes me want to own one is the f/2 lens, unheard except in DSLRs. I
> > read somewhere that the EVF is not so good, and the noise correction is a
> > problem. I'm not worried about megapixels. I won't use RAW much, since I
> > don't plan to spend time with a computer. What I want is lots of 
> > resolution
> > and detail, and the ability to shoot in low light.
> >
> > MK
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


--
  -------------------------------------
  regards, mehrdad