Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Wednesday Walk
From: douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp)
Date: Mon Nov 28 08:36:12 2005
References: <BFB08EAB.8E78%bdcolen@comcast.net>

More  or less what I wrote B.D., not particularly fruitful.
Nathan, I don't smoke that much , it must have been fog.
But I'm not going to cheat and post something that was shot on a fogless 
Tuesday ;-)
Thanks for looking, and your comments
Douglas

B. D. Colen wrote:

>I'd say that a fog picture has to have something interesting about it, but
>that something interesting doesn't have to be sharp if it's obvious that
>it's fog we're looking at. This one doesn't quite have it - It's pleasant to
>look at, but I find myself asking, 'what's your point?'
>
>
>On 11/28/05 12:08 AM, "Nathan Wajsman" <nathan.wajsman@planet.nl> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hi Douglas,
>>
>>A successful fog picture needs to have something sharp in the foreground
>>to make it clear that it is fog and not, say, faulty development. Your
>>scene is nice, but you would need some of GeeBee's inflatable ducks or
>>swans in the lower part of the picture to make it a successful image.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Nathan
>>
>>Douglas Sharp wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>The wednesday walk along the canal was not particularly fruitful this 
>>>week.
>>>http://gallery.leica-users.org/New-Old-Pictures/MG_3321_edited_2
>>>The blobs are ducks and seagulls, not spots on the picture.
>>>Douglas
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>  
>

In reply to: Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Wednesday Walk)