Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'd say that a fog picture has to have something interesting about it, but that something interesting doesn't have to be sharp if it's obvious that it's fog we're looking at. This one doesn't quite have it - It's pleasant to look at, but I find myself asking, 'what's your point?' On 11/28/05 12:08 AM, "Nathan Wajsman" <nathan.wajsman@planet.nl> wrote: > Hi Douglas, > > A successful fog picture needs to have something sharp in the foreground > to make it clear that it is fog and not, say, faulty development. Your > scene is nice, but you would need some of GeeBee's inflatable ducks or > swans in the lower part of the picture to make it a successful image. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Douglas Sharp wrote: > >> The wednesday walk along the canal was not particularly fruitful this >> week. >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/New-Old-Pictures/MG_3321_edited_2 >> The blobs are ducks and seagulls, not spots on the picture. >> Douglas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >>