Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/11/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?
From: lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda)
Date: Sun Nov 13 17:17:33 2005
References: <200511131801.jADI0JXx080461@server1.waverley.reid.org><c77548536c2becfd98b9916e1b996f55@shaw.ca><00a501c5e89b$649ea2a0$0400a8c0@robertbxucevjs> <0CDD8C21-4150-4C83-8CC3-A1A04792A6DB@interlink.es> <013601c5e8b5$e3f44bd0$0400a8c0@robertbxucevjs>
On 14/11/2005, at 1:53, Robert Meier wrote:
> Luis -- I don't understand. Are you saying that 4.72 inches is a
> SMALL range of depth?
> It's plenty for a good portrait.
It's fine or not, depending what kind of portraiture are you doing.
I won't stick with it for on location or group portraiture even
stopping down a little.
In reply to:
Message from bruent at shaw.ca (Bruce) ([Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?)
Message from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?)