Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Sun Nov 13 13:44:32 2005
References: <200511131801.jADI0JXx080461@server1.waverley.reid.org> <c77548536c2becfd98b9916e1b996f55@shaw.ca>

It should be added that Delta 3200 is fully usable with a Rollei, yielding 
beautiful 11x14 prints.   It has three extra stops of speed over Tri-X, so 
an f2.8 lens becomes the equivalent of f1.   The Rollei Noctilux!



> On Nov 13, 2005, Luis Miguel Casta wrote:
>> Handheld low-light photography isn't practical with MF as you fall
>> into slow speeds quite easily and even a f2.8 lens will require any
>> sort of camera support. Under 1/30 your chances to get a handheld
>> sharp image are almost null, perhaps a bit higher with the big wides.
>
> While the usual TLR (or RF MF) lens is slower than the typical primes used 
> on a 35mm RF, the larger image area and the steadiness of a Rolleiflex (or 
> similar camera) makes these less unsuited to low light than you imply, and 
> as long as the subject is not moving too much, objects on scene 
> (furniture, walls, or a table tripod) extend the lower range further This 
> also works with a faster lensed 35mm camera, but it is often easier to 
> view with a"braced" TLR. Not strictly hand held, but low light and not too 
> restricted for it. In really low light like streets at night I would 
> rather use an RF with something faster than f/2, but if things are not so 
> dim a MF (at least non-SLR) goes quite far.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?)
In reply to: Message from bruent at shaw.ca (Bruce) ([Leica] OT: bronica 645 RF?)