Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] janet...
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Sat Nov 12 14:45:09 2005
References: <17235D43-0BF0-4B00-BDDD-609239396FB9@cox.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20051112134132.0abd9e68@192.168.100.42>

Richard offered:
Subject: Re: [Leica] janet...
> I think the nurse's expression helps it picture-wise. Toward that train of 
> thought, from the DOF, I think you are shooting at F1 already? Perhaps 
> shooting at ASA800 @1.4 would give you just a wee bit more of the nurse in 
> focus?  <<<<

Hi Richard,
No, no, no. he doesn't want to bring her slightly more into focus, she's 
perfect at f1.0 where she should be. The message is still there this way.... 
"it's a very sick child!"  She's in attendance in a support position.

If one is going to bring the nurse more in focus it only works if she's all 
the way in focus. Then she becomes a distraction taking the attention away 
from the child.

At the moment she's there out of focus as best she should be, because the 
child is the point of focus. But if the nurse were sharper, even a little 
bit, then she creates a kind of "over all out of focus look."

All she needs is to be seen, that means the child is being taken care of.

I know you mean well, but this is beautiful as it should be, as is!

ted













Replies: Reply from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] janet...)
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] janet...)
Reply from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] janet...)
In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] janet...)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] janet...)