Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The only lens I got rid of in my Nikon collection was my 35mm lens simply because I just didn't find myself using it in the new realm of DOFs. Every other lens I owned previous to going digital is still used and produces wonderful photos, corners or not. I have them from 20mm to 300mm. The only lens I added was a wide zoom to get down to something that I am more akin to when shooting my leica but then, I never pick up an SLR and expect to shoot the same way I do with my leica. I still don't see the big deal. Its just me. Dave On 11/2/05, F?lix L?pez de Maturana <FELIXMATURANA@telefonica.net> wrote: > >I suppose if there were actually a negative the whole "full frame" > >thing would make sense to me but honestly 35mm was a random size and > >any CMOS/CCD is a random size. Its just photos. > > > Quite true unless you appreciate an arsenal of lenses you already own > and you wish to use, as a mere example, a 14mm f2.8 as a *true* extreme > wide, a lens for architectural proposes as the 24mm TSE, and you wish > have the same DOF you are used to. And, besides, you wish less noise and > more physical resolution. Not so easy. It has, nevertheless, some issues > too. > > Felix > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >