Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/11/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Leica D200
From: FELIXMATURANA at telefonica.net (Félix López de Maturana)
Date: Wed Nov 2 09:09:11 2005
References: <200511021514.jA2FAMdU022814@server1.waverley.reid.org>

>I suppose if there were actually a negative the whole "full frame"
>thing would make sense to me but honestly 35mm was a random size and
>any CMOS/CCD is a random size. Its just photos.


Quite true unless you appreciate an arsenal of lenses you already own 
and you wish to use, as a mere example,  a 14mm f2.8 as a *true* extreme 
wide, a lens for architectural proposes as the 24mm TSE,  and you wish 
have the same DOF you are used to. And, besides, you wish less noise and 
more physical resolution. Not so easy. It has, nevertheless, some issues 
too.

Felix



Replies: Reply from dcm at pobox.com (David C. Mason) ([Leica] Re:Leica D200)