Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] eyes...
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Sat Oct 29 22:07:05 2005
References: <205.d64d4c8.309585aa@aol.com>

I stand corrected, you are right in the series as a set no question.

ted


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <SonC@aol.com>
To: <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] eyes...




In a message dated 10/29/2005 9:04:52 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
tedgrant@shaw.ca writes:

Hi Sonny  & Steve,
Sorry Sonny I'd have gone the other way, thrown all the others  out and kept
"Eyes 5" as it's the only magical photograph!  :-)


Yeah but...He was presenting a set. that was clearly not part of the  set.
The others had a relationship; engaging the camera. I stand by my  edit. 
Save
the single for another posting.


Regards,
Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
Natchitoches, Louisiana
Oldest continuous  settlement in La Louisiane
?galit?, libert?,  crawfish

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] eyes...)
In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] eyes...)