Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have type 2. I think it is a "minolta" design. The images I have taken with it are very "leica" in quality however, and I've never thought "oh dear not the 24 again". I do not test lenes in any scientific way however. Cheers On 27/10/2005, at 9:27 PM, Didier Ludwig wrote: > Dear LUGgers > > I'm interested in the Leica 24/2.8 Elmarit-R lens for using on a dslr > with crop-factor. > > I have read there are three types: > > - Type 1 (1974-90) 2 or 3 cams > - Type 2 (1990-) 3 cams > - Type 3 (1998-) ROM > > My questions are: > > - How does this lens perform? Are there optical differences between > the three types? > - As the lens would be used manually with an adapter, am I right > supposing it does not matter if there are 1, 2 or 3 cams or ROM? > - has anyone ever compared this lens to a manual focus Nikkor 24/2.8 > or 24/2.0? > > Any advice is appreciated. TIA. > Didier > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > Alastair