Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, it's small, a function of the sensor size I suspect. I do not, however, find it dim. But as everyone knows, nothing is an R8/R9 finder but an R8/R9 finder. On the other hand, there's quite a difference between $699 and $8500 - and, quite frankly, there is not an $8000 difference in image quality. Difference? I'm sure. But it's not even a $4000 difference in image quality. ;-) On 10/25/05 12:03 PM, "Didier Ludwig" <rangefinder@screengang.com> wrote: > >> Hi, Didier - the two latest shots were taken with the E-500 and the 50 f2 >> (100 35 mm equiv.). I would NOT, btw, suggest that the E-500 is a pro >> camera >> - it's not. But is is an excellent alternative to a high-end fixed-lens >> digital. > > Thanks B.D. > I know about the E-500, it's an entry level DSLR, but sympathically fits my > budget... The E-500 finder is said to be quite small and dim (on the > dpreview > review) - what do you say about it? > Didier > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information