Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Martin, he has Tri-X, not TMX. The Tmax films might, like the Delta films, have different characteristics than the traditional films. But both HP5+ and Tri-X are traditional films. I wouldn't worry about it. Daniel On 10/18/05, Martin Jangowski <martin@jangowski.de> wrote: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Daniel Ridings wrote: > > > No, if your times, like those of the chart, are the same. > > > > Daniel > > > > On 10/18/05, Richard <richard-lists@imagecraft.com> wrote: > >> Quick :-) According to the Digitaltruth dev chart, both Tri X and HP5+ > >> have > >> the same development time using DDX. I happen to have 2 rolls of Tri X > >> and > >> 1 roll of HP5+. Would there be any problem putting them all in the same > >> tank?> > > Unfortunately, it depends. My times for Delta 400 and APX100 in D76H are > identical. Unfortunately, sensitometer strips from APX100 are visibly > different (less dense) if I develop them in the same bath with Delta 400. > It seems that the Deltas have something that retards development of at > least some films. I don't mix Deltas with other films any more... I'm not > sure if TMX and HP5+ have the same problem, but I wouldn't take a chance. > > Gr??e aus Hohenlohe, > > Martin Jangowski > > | Martin Jangowski E-Mail: Martin@Jangowski.de| > | Netzwerke und Multimedia | > | Voice: +49 7946/940790 Fax: +49 7946/940791 | > | Snail Mail: Von-Olnhausen Str. 4 74626 Bretzfeld Germany | > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >